The Issue of Arms Race Limitation in the Expert Memoranda of the Institute for USA Studies, USSR Academy of Sciences, Late 1960s – Early 1970s

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article examines Soviet perspectives on the limitation of the arms race in the late 1960s and early 1970s, as reflected in expert memoranda produced by the Institute for US Studies of the USSR Academy of Sciences and submitted to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). The study highlights the development of arguments in favour of détente within these documents. The memoranda reveal the efforts of Soviet Americanists to promote the normalisation of relations with the United States – an objective of growing significance given the ambivalence within the Party leadership regarding rapprochement. In this context, the Institute’s director, Georgy Arbatov – who maintained close ties with prominent figures such as Brezhnev, Andropov, and Gromyko – sought to position the Institute’s expertise as a resource for those advocating engagement. Soviet experts justified arms control on both economic and strategic grounds. They underscored the disproportionate economic burden of the arms race on the USSR, which impeded much-needed domestic reform, while also highlighting the technological and economic superiority of the United States, which risked shifting the strategic balance. Alongside analytical assessments, the memoranda contained concrete policy recommendations. These included exploiting internal political dynamics in the United States, expanding public diplomacy, and strengthening ties with American society. The experts advocated for a flexible strategy capable of sustaining bilateral relations beyond short-term electoral cycles or presidential administrations. Taken together, the memoranda constitute a significant source for understanding the role of foreign policy expertise in the Soviet Union and reflect broader attempts to conceptualise alternative approaches to US-Soviet relations during the Cold War.

About the authors

I. M. Tarbeev

Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: actimel@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Naumkin V.V., Skorospelov P.P. “Silam socializma vygodno, chtoby amerikancy pokrepche zavyazli v Yugo-Vostochnoj Azii”: Prezidium CK KPSS i opredelenie strategicheskoj linii SSSR vo Vtoroj indokitajskoj vojne v 1965 godu [“It Is Favorable To the Forces of Socialism to Keep the Americans in Southeast Asia Longer”: The Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee in the Determination of the Strategic Line of the USSR in the Second Indochina War of 1965] // Novaya i Novejshaya Istoriya [Modern and Contemporary History]. 2023. № 3. S. 131–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013038640025913-2 (In Russ.)
  2. Nekrasov V.L. “Dilemma Khrushcheva”: reforma Gosplana SSSR, neftekhimicheskiy proyekt i vyzovy Kholodnoy voyny (vtoraya polovina 1950-kh – pervaya polovina 1960-kh gg.) [“Khrushchev’s Dilemma”: the reform of the USSR State Planning Committee, the petrochemical project and the challenges of the Cold War (the second half of the 1950s – the first half of the 1960s)]. Moskva, 2019. (In Russ.)
  3. Schattenberg S. “Razgovor glukhonemykh”? Kultura khrushchevskoy vneshney politiki i vizit kantslera Adenauera v Moskvu v 1955 godu [“Conversation of the deaf and dumb”? The culture of Khrushchev’s foreign policy and the visit of Chancellor Adenauer to Moscow in 1955] // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review]. 2009. № 6. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2009/6/razgovor-gluhonemyh-kultura-hrushhevskoj-vneshnej-politiki-i-vizit-kanczlera-adenauera-v-moskvu-v-1955-godu.html (access date: 12.04.2025). (In Russ.)
  4. Schattenberg S. Leonid Brezhnev: velichie i tragediya cheloveka i strany [Leonid Brezhnev: the greatness and tragedy of man and country]. Moskva, 2017. (In Russ.)
  5. Tarbeev I.M. Ekspertno-akademicheskaya amerikanistika v sisteme sovetskoy vneshnepoliticheskoy ekspertizy (konets 1960-kh – nachalo 1970-kh gg.) [Expert academic American Studies in the system of Soviet foreign policy expertise (late 1960s – early 1970s)] // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of the Russian State University of Economics. Series: Political Science. History. International relations]. 2020. № 2. S. 10–21. (In Russ.)
  6. Zhuravleva V. I. Obshchee proshloe russkikh i amerikantsev [The common past of Russians and Americans]. Moskva, 2021. (In Russ.)
  7. Zhuravleva V.I. “Krokodil” protiv Dyadi Sema: amerikanskiy Drugoy v sovetskoy karikaturistike v nachale kholodnoy voyny [“Crocodile” against Uncle Sam: the American Other in Soviet Cartooning at the beginning of the Cold War] (1947–1960) // Istoriya [History]. 2022. T. 13. Vyp. 9 (119). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840022753-7 (In Russ.)
  8. Zubok V. M. Neudavshayasya imperiya. Sovetskiy Soyuz v Kholodnoy voyne ot Stalina do Gorbacheva [The Failed Empire. The Soviet Union in the Cold War from Stalin to Gorbachev]. Moskva, 2011. (In Russ.)
  9. Gaddis J.L. The Cold War: A New History. New York, 2005.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences