Evaluation of the mandibular retromolar space in orthodontic patients: a review

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The retromolar space is an anatomical zone located distal to the last molar and bounded by the anterior border of the ramus of the mandible. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of current scientific data concerning the morphometry and clinical significance of the mandibular retromolar space in orthodontic practice, including issues of its anatomical variability. Anatomical variations, diagnostic methods using cone-beam computed tomography, assessment criteria, factors influencing the volume of the retromolar space, as well as modern approaches to its quantitative measurement are discussed in detail. Particular attention is paid to the role of accurate preliminary analysis of this anatomical zone in the planning and prediction of mandibular molar distalization using various orthodontic techniques, including orthodontic mini-implants, skeletal anchorage, and fixed appliances, which helps to minimize the risk of complications.

Based on the analysis and systematization of published data, we have shown that the mandibular retromolar space should be regarded not as a passive anatomical reserve but as an active biomechanical limit that determines the feasibility, extent, and strategy of molar distalization. The introduction of a standardized protocol for assessing the retromolar space into clinical practice improves the predictability, effectiveness, and safety of molar distalization, expanding the possibilities of non-extraction orthodontic treatment and improving long-term outcomes.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Kamola Zh. Sayfieva

Russian University of Medicine

Author for correspondence.
Email: kamolala22@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-9410-9643
SPIN-code: 9825-5783

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Nailya S. Drobysheva

Russian University of Medicine

Email: n.drobysheva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5612-3451
SPIN-code: 1246-5965

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Kristina G. Titova

Russian University of Medicine

Email: titovak537@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3379-9671

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Polina G. Artiukh

Russian University of Medicine

Email: polinaartyukh17@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-2378-692X
SPIN-code: 2686-1962

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Proffit WR, Fields H, Larson B, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2018. ISBN: 978-0-323-54387-3
  2. Richardson ME. The role of the third molar in the cause of late lower arch crowding: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95(1):79–83. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90139-x
  3. Kim TW, Artun J, Behbehani F, Artese F. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extraction of 4 premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(2):138–145. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.13
  4. Jung YH, Cho BH. Radiographic evaluation of the course and visibility of the mandibular canal Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2014. doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.4.273
  5. Fan Z, Zhang Q, Jiang Y, et al. Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns: Cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Angle Orthod. 2022;92(5):606–612. doi: 10.2319/112021-854.1 EDN: URXVWW
  6. Puche-Roses M, Blasco-Serra A, Valverde-Navarro AA, Puche-Torres M. Prevalence and morphometric analysis of the retromolar canal in a Spanish population sample: a helical CT scan study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022;27(2):e142–e149. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25069
  7. Kaseh AE, Shayeb MA, Kuduruthullah S, Gulrez N. The retromolar space and wisdom teeth in humans: reasons for surgical tooth extraction. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(1):117–121. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716312 EDN: WZZMRQ
  8. Zhao Z, Wang Q, Yi P, et al. Quantitative evaluation of retromolar space in adults with different vertical facial types. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(6):857–865. doi: 10.2319/121219-787.1 EDN: FROFTB
  9. Ghougassian SS, Ghafari JG. Association between mandibular third molar formation and retromolar space. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(6):946–950. doi: 10.2319/120113-883.1
  10. Mendoza-García LV, Vaillard-Jiménez E, García-Rocha A, et al. Effect of orthodontic treatment involving first premolar extractions on mandibular third molar angulation and retromolar space. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3):e333–e337. doi: 10.4317/jced.53434
  11. Filo K, Schneider T, Kruse AL, et al. Frequency and anatomy of the retromolar canal—implications for the dental practice. Swiss Dent J. 2015;125(3):278–292. (In English, German). doi: 10.61872/sdj-2015-03-149
  12. Piskórz M, Bukiel A, Kania K, et al. Retromolar canal: Frequency in a Polish population based on CBCT and clinical implications— a preliminary study. Dent Med Probl. 2023;60(2):273–278. doi: 10.17219/dmp/147005 EDN: YKFHVT
  13. Suresh N, Cj S, Patil K, e al. Prevalence and morphometric analysis of retromolar canals and foramina: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025;29(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01373-z EDN: UJKKSA
  14. Chen G, Altos O. Comparison of the prevalence and linear measurements of the retromolar Canal on cone beam CT scans in Palestine and China. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1593. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06895-2 EDN: PWICFA
  15. von Arx T, Hänni A, Sendi P, et al. Radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1630–1635. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.007
  16. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. “Safe zones”: a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(2):191–197. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0191:SZAGFM]2.0.CO;2
  17. Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(4):495–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.057
  18. Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(12):1351–1359. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x
  19. Ventä I, Ylipaavalniemi P, Turtola L. Clinical outcome of third molars in adults followed during 18 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(2):182–185. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.011
  20. Liu K, Chu G, Zhang C, Yang Y. Boundary of mandibular molar distalization in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024;27(4):515–526. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12778 EDN: ZYUZMR

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Supplement 1. Primary study selection algorithm.
Download (85KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86295 от 11.12.2023 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80635 от 15.03.2021 г
.