EVALUATION OF THE MANDIBULAR RETROMOLAR SPACE IN ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS:A REVIEW
- Authors: Sayfieva K.Z.1, Drobysheva N.S.1, Titova K.G1, Artiukh P.G1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian university of medicine
- Section: Reviews
- Submitted: 20.03.2026
- Accepted: 06.04.2026
- Published: 09.04.2026
- URL: https://rjdentistry.com/1728-2802/article/view/704736
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent704736
- ID: 704736
Cite item
Abstract
The retromolar space is an anatomical zone located distal to the last molar and bounded by the anterior border of the mandibular ramus. This literature review presents a comprehensive analysis of current scientific data concerning the morphometry and clinical significance of the mandibular retromolar space in orthodontic practice, including issues of its anatomical variability. Anatomical variations, diagnostic methods using cone-beam computed tomography, assessment criteria, factors influencing the volume of the retromolar space, as well as modern approaches to its quantitative measurement are discussed in detail. Particular attention is paid to the role of accurate preliminary analysis of this anatomical zone in the planning and prediction of mandibular molar distalization using various orthodontic techniques, including orthodontic mini-implants, skeletal anchorage, and fixed appliances, which helps to minimize the risk of complications.
Based on the analysis and systematization of literature data, it is shown that the mandibular retromolar space should be considered not as a passive anatomical reserve, but as an active biomechanical limit that determines the possibility, extent, and strategy of molar distalization. The introduction of a standardized protocol for assessing the retromolar space into clinical practice improves the predictability, effectiveness, and safety of molar distalization, expanding the possibilities of non-extraction orthodontic treatment and improving long-term outcomes.
Full Text
About the authors
Kamola Zhamshidovna Sayfieva
Russian university of medicine
Author for correspondence.
Email: Kamolala22@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-9410-9643
SPIN-code: 9825-5783
Russian Federation, 9a Vucheticha st, Moscow, Russia, 127206
Nailya S. Drobysheva
Email: n.drobysheva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5612-3451
SPIN-code: 1246-5965
Candidate of Medical Sciences, associate professor
Kristina G Titova
Email: titovak537@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3379-9671
Polina G Artiukh
Email: polinaartyukh17@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-2378-692X
SPIN-code: 2686-1962
References
- Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2018. ISBN: 978-0-323-54387-3
- Richardson ME. The role of the third molar in the cause of late lower arch crowding: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90139-2
- Kim TW, Artun J, Behbehani F, Artese F. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extraction of 4 premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(2):138-145. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.13
- Jung YH, Cho BH. The assessment of the retromolar space and the mandibular canal by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2007;37(2):77-81.
- «Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns: Cone-beam computed tomography analysis» - Fan Z, Zhang Q, Jiang Y, Qin Q, Huang S, Guo J. Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod. 2022 Jul 18;92(5):606–12. doi: 10.2319/112021-854.1.
- Miguel Puche-Roses, Arantxa Blasco-Serra, Alfonso A. Valverde-Navarro, Miguel Puche-Torres: Prevalence and morphometric analysis of the retromolar canal in a Spanish population sample: a helical CT scan study. DOI: https:10.4317/medoral.25069
- Kaseh AE, Shayeb MA, Kuduruthullah S, Gulrez N. The Retromolar Space and Wisdom Teeth in Humans: Reasons for Surgical Tooth Extraction. Eur J Dentistry. 2021;15(1):117-121. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716312
- Quantitative evaluation of retromolar space in adults with different vertical facial types:Zuodong Zhao, Qiuyu Wang, Ping Yi, Futing Huang, Xiaohui Zhou, Qianya Gao, T Peter Tsay, Chang Liu. PMID: 33378518 PMCID: PMC8028430 doi: 10.2319/121219-787.1
- Association between mandibular third molar formation and retromolar space: Saro S Ghougassian,Joseph G Ghafari. PMID: 24773221 PMCID: PMC8638499 doi: 10.2319/120113-883.1
- Effect of orthodontic treatment involving first premolar extractions on mandibular third molar angulation and retromolar space: Luz-Victoria Mendoza-García, Esther Vaillard-Jiménez , Araceli García-Rocha, Carlos Bellot-Arcís, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo. PMID: 28298970 PMCID: PMC5347277 doi: 10.4317/jced.53434
- Frequency and anatomy of the retromolar canal - implications for the dental practice.Katharina Filo, Thomas Schneider, Astrid L Kruse, Michael Locher, Klaus W Grätz, Heinz-Theo Lübbers. PMID: 26168686.doi: 10.61872/sdj-2015-03-149
- Retromolar canal: Frequency in a Polish population based on CBCT and clinical implications - a preliminary study.Magdalena Piskórz, Aleksandra Bukiel , Karolina Kania, Dorota Kałkowska , Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska. PMID: 37382052 doi: 10.17219/dmp/147005
- Prevalence and morphometric analysis of retromolar canals and foramina: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Namrata Suresh , Sanjay Cj , Karthikeya Patil , Nandita Suresh , Sukumaran Anil .PMID: 40153048. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01373-z
- Comparison of the prevalence and linear measurements of the retromolar Canal on cone beam CT scans in Palestine and China.Gang Chen, Omran Altos.PMID: 41073951 PMCID: PMC12512705 doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06895-2
- von Arx T, Hänni A, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1630-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.007
- Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. "Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(2):191-197. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0191:SZAGFM]2.0.CO;2
- Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(4):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.057
- Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(12):1351-1359. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x
- Ventä I, Ylipaavalniemi P, Turtola L. Clinical outcome of third molars in adults followed during 18 years . J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(8):848-852. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.011
- Boundary of mandibular molar distalization in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Keyuan Liu , Guang Chu , Chengfei Zhang , Yanqi Yang.PMID: 38462853 doi: 10.1111/ocr.12778
Supplementary files



