Email this article 
COMPARISON OF THE NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL CALCULATIONS OF THE RESOLUTION FUNCTION FOR A POWDER NEUTRON DIFFRACTOMETER
- Authors: Drozhzhov K.A.1, Kibalin Y.A.2, Tarnavich V.V.1, Golosovsky I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named after B.P. Konstantinov, National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Gatchina, Leningrad oblast, 188300 Russia
- Laboratoire Léon Brillouin UMR12 CEA-CNRS, Bât. 563 CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
- Issue: Vol 68, No 4 (2023)
- Pages: 637-643
- Section: ПРИБОРЫ, АППАРАТУРА
- URL: https://rjdentistry.com/0023-4761/article/view/673411
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023476123600209
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JSAMDN
- ID: 673411
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The resolution of the high-intensity diffractometer, developed for the PIK reactor (Gatchina), is calculated both numerically and analytically. These two approaches give different results. All neutron trajectories calculated numerically are limited by the geometry of optical elements. Therefore, the diffraction profile has a trapezoidal shape, which can be seen well at large diffraction angles. Analytical formulas yield a Gaussian line profile. The difference in profiles leads to a difference in the resolution curves calculated numerically and analytically. This difference is especially pronounced for the diffractometers with medium and low resolution, optimized to the maximum intensity.
About the authors
K. A. Drozhzhov
St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named after B.P. Konstantinov, National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Gatchina, Leningrad oblast, 188300 Russia
Email: drozhzhov_ka@pnpi.nrcki.ru
Россия, Ленинградская обл.,
Гатчина
Yu. A. Kibalin
Laboratoire Léon Brillouin UMR12 CEA-CNRS, Bât. 563 CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
Email: drozhzhov_ka@pnpi.nrcki.ru
France, Gif-sur-Yvette
V. V. Tarnavich
St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named after B.P. Konstantinov, National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Gatchina, Leningrad oblast, 188300 Russia
Email: drozhzhov_ka@pnpi.nrcki.ru
Россия, Ленинградская обл.,
Гатчина
I. V. Golosovsky
St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named after B.P. Konstantinov, National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Gatchina, Leningrad oblast, 188300 Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: drozhzhov_ka@pnpi.nrcki.ru
Россия, Ленинградская обл.,
Гатчина
References
- Ковальчук М.В., Воронин В.В., Гаврилов С.В. и др. // Кристаллография. 2022. Т. 67. № 5. С.785. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023476122050095
- Caglioti G., Paolioti A., Ricci F.P. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1958. V. 3. P. 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0369-643X(58)90029-X
- Popovici M. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1965. V. 36. P. 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(65)90422-2
- Архипов Г.И., Садовничий В.А., Чубариков В.Н. Лекции по математическому анализу. М.: Высшая школа, 1999. 695 с.
- Cooper M.J., Nathans R. // Acta Cryst. 1967. V. 23 (3). P. 357. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X67002816
- Bobrovskii V.I., Zhdakhin I.L. // J. Surface Investigation. X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques 2007. V. 1 (4). P. 72. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745100704012X
- Hewat A.W. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1975. V. 127. P. 361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-554X(75)80006-1
- Leo D. Cussen // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 2016. V. 821. P. 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.052
- Балагуров А.М., Голосовский И.В., Курбаков А.И. и др. // Дифрактометры на реакторе ПИК для решения фундаментальных и прикладных задач. РНСИ-КС, устные доклады. 2014. С. 50.
- Puente-Orench I., Clergeau J.F., Martínez S. et al. // J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2014. V. 549. P. 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/549/1/012003
- Hansen T.C., Henry P.F., Fischer H.E. et al. // Meas. Sci. Technol. 2008. V. 19. P. 034001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/3/034001
- Suard E., Hewat A. // Scientific Review: The Super-D2B project at the ILL. Neutron News, 2001. V. 12 (4). P. 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10448630108245006
- Fischer P., Frey G., Koch M. et al. // Physica B. 2000. V. 276–278. P. 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01399-X
- Fischer P., Keller L., Schefer J. et al. // Neutron News. 2000. V. 11 (3). P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10448630008233743
- Avdeev M., Hester J.R., Peterson V.K. et al. // Neutron News. 2009. V. 20 (4). P. 29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10448630903241100
- Studer A.J., Hagen M.E., Noakes T.J. // Physica B. 2006. V. 385–386. P. 1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2006.05.323
- Loopstra B.O. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1966. V. 44. P. 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(66)90149-2
- Kibalin I.A., Gukasov A. // Phys. Rev. Res. 2019. № 1. 033100. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033100
- Gukasov A., Brown P.J. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2010. V. 22. P. 502201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/22/50/502201
- Wright A.F., Berneron M., Heathman S.P. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1981. V. 180. P. 650. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(81)90113-0
- Stone M.B., Niedziela J.L., Loguillo M.J. et al. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014. V. 85. P. 085101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4891302
- Wannberg A., Mellergard A., Zetterstrom P. et al. // Neutron Research. 1999. V. 8. P. 133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10238169908200050
- Кибалин Ю.А., Голосовский И.В., Филимонов А.В. // Научно-технические ведомости СПбГПУ. 2008. Т. 56. С. 116. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12802818
Supplementary files
