Formation of the interdental papilla by surgical method

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The loss of interdental gingival papillae or the presence of “black triangles” between the teeth is one of the important problems in aesthetic dentistry, along with the loss of teeth and violation of the integrity of the hard tissues of the tooth. These patients have aesthetic, phonetic disorders, and it is also possible that food gets stuck between the teeth, which causes discomfort in the oral cavity and leads to periodontal diseases. Currently, an increasing percentage of people with orthopedic structures have a recession of the interdental gum. To improve the predicted result, it is necessary to approach this problem in an interdisciplinary way.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The search for publications was conducted in four electronic databases: Pubmed, Google search, eLibrary and dissercat from 2006 to 2021. 157 full-text publications were analyzed, of which 40 publications were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS: According to various studies, the restoration of the lost interdental papilla varies from 1.68 to 5 mm. Complete restoration of the interdental papilla occurs when using microsurgical methods of restoration of the interdental gum. The least injury to soft tissues leads to the best results and reduces the risk of complications.

CONCLUSION: Restoration of the interdental papilla is a complex surgical manipulation where microsurgical instruments must be used. Any rupture or excessive injury of the isthmus of the interdental papilla leads to a violation of blood supply, which leads to necrosis of the graft and aesthetic dissatisfaction.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anastasia A. Babanina

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Author for correspondence.
Email: anastasiababanina@mail.ru
Russian Federation, 10, Novoslobodskaya Street, 127055, Moscow

Maria Yu. Dorzhieva

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: maria.parodont@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 10, Novoslobodskaya Street, 127055, Moscow

Galina S. Runova

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: runovagal@mail.ru

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), professor

Russian Federation, 10, Novoslobodskaya Street, 127055, Moscow

Zalina E. Revazova

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: zalina_r@list.ru

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), associate professor

Russian Federation, 10, Novoslobodskaya Street, 127055, Moscow

Fatima Yu. Daurova

RUDN University of Russia

Email: 5071098@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0694-2934

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor

Russian Federation, 10, Novoslobodskaya Street, 127055, Moscow

Diana I. Tomaeva

RUDN University of Russia

Email: tomaevad@inbox.ru

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 10, Novoslobodskaya Street, 127055, Moscow

References

  1. Budaichiev GM-A, Abakarov TA. Issledovanie vidimosti verkhnechelyustnykh mezhzubnykh sosochkov vo vremya ulybki. In: Evraziiskii konress: Stomatologicheskoe zdorov'e detei v XXI veke. Evraziiskii kongress. Kazan', 20–21 aprelya 2017 g. Kazan'; 2017. P:32–33. (In Russ).
  2. Dereiko LV, Pleshakova VV. Gingival harmony (pink aesthetics) and factors that lead to it. Dentistry. Aesthetics. Innovations. 2017;1(1):150–160. (In Russ).
  3. Singh VP, Uppoor AS, Nayak DG, Shah D. Black triangle dilemma and its management in esthetic dentistry. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013;10(3):296–301. PMC3760350
  4. Batra P, Daing A, Azam I, et al. Impact of altered gingival characteristics on smile esthetics: Laypersons' perspectives by Q sort methodology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(1):82–90 e82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.12.010
  5. Sharma AA, Park JH. Esthetic considerations in interdental papilla: remediation and regeneration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010;22(1):18–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00307.x
  6. Shaimardanova G, Mukhamedzhanova L. More on the assessment of papilla when using self-ligating bracket systems. Acta medica Eurasia. 2016;(2):33–37. (In Russ).
  7. An SS, Choi YJ, Kim JY, et al. Risk factors associated with open gingival embrasures after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(3):267–274. doi: 10.2319/061917-399.12
  8. Nordland WP, Tarnow DP. A classification system for loss of papillary height. J Periodontol. 1998;69(10):1124–1126. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.10.1124
  9. Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17(4):326–333.
  10. Cardaropoli D, Re S, Corrente G. The Papilla Presence Index (PPI): a new system to assess interproximal papillary levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24(5):488–492. doi: 10.11607/prd.00.0596
  11. Ahmed AJ, Nichani AS, Venugopal R. An Evaluation of the Effect of Periodontal Biotype on Inter-Dental Papilla Proportions, Distances Between Facial and Palatal Papillae in the Maxillary Anterior Dentition. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(6):517–522. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12640
  12. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol. 1992;63(12):995–996. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.12.995
  13. Martegani P, Silvestri M, Mascarello F, et al. Morphometric study of the interproximal unit in the esthetic region to correlate anatomic variables affecting the aspect of soft tissue embrasure space. J Periodontol. 2007;78(12):2260–2265. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060517
  14. Takei HH. The interdental space. Dent Clin North Am. 1980;24(2):169–176.
  15. Sghaireen MG, Al-Zarea BK, Al-Shorman HM, Al-Omiri MK. Clinical measurement of the height of the interproximal contact area in maxillary anterior teeth. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2013;7(3):325–330. doi: 10.12816/0006061
  16. Wahbi MA, Al Sharief HS, Tayeb H, Bokhari A. Minimally invasive use of coloured composite resin in aesthetic restoration of periodontially involved teeth: Case report. Saudi Dent J. 2013;25(2):83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.02.001
  17. Zanin F, Moreira MS, Pedroni ACF, et al. Hemolasertherapy: A Novel Procedure for Gingival Papilla Regeneration-Case Report. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(4):221–226. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4349
  18. Beagle JR. Surgical reconstruction of the interdental papilla: case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(2):145–151.
  19. Chaulkar PP, Mali RS, Mali AM, et al. A comparative evaluation of papillary reconstruction by modified Beagle's technique with the Beagle's surgical technique: A clinical and radiographic study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017;21(3):218–223. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_166_17
  20. Kaushik A, Pk P, Jhamb K, et al. Clinical evaluation of papilla reconstruction using subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):ZC77–81. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9458.4881
  21. Henriques PG, Okajima LS, Siqueira S, Jr. Surgical reconstruction of the interdental papilla: 2 case reports. Gen Dent. 2018;66(4):e1–e4.
  22. Jaiswal P, Bhongade M, Tiwari I, et al. Surgical Reconstruction of Interdental Papilla Using Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG) with a Coronally Advanced Flap: A Clinical Evaluation of Five Cases. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010;11(6):049–057.
  23. Ahila E, Saravana Kumar R, Reddy VK, et al. Augmentation of Interdental Papilla with Platelet-rich Fibrin. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(2):213–217. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_812_17
  24. Feuillet D, Keller JF, Agossa K. Interproximal Tunneling with a Customized Connective Tissue Graft: A Microsurgical Technique for Interdental Papilla Reconstruction. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(6):833–839. doi: 10.11607/prd.3549
  25. Nordland WP, Sandhu HS, Perio C. Microsurgical technique for augmentation of the interdental papilla: three case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28(6):543–549.
  26. Muthukumar S, Ajit P, Sundararajan S, Rao SR. Reconstruction of interdental papilla using autogenous bone and connective tissue grafts. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20(4):464–467. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.193164

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Classification of interdental gum recession Tarnow and Norland.

Download (202KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Classification of interdental gum recession Jemt.

Download (45KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Classification of interdental gum recession Cardaropoli.

Download (218KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Modified technique of restoration of the interdental papilla Beagle.

Download (152KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 5. Beagle’s modified methodology.

Download (182KB)
Indexing metadata
7. Fig. 6. A. Kaushik interdental gum restoration technique.

Download (385KB)
Indexing metadata
8. Fig. 7. The technique of restoration of the interdental gum by P.S.G. Henriques.

Download (394KB)
Indexing metadata
9. Fig. 8. The technique of restoration of the interdental gum by H. Singh.

Download (297KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86295 от 11.12.2023 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80635 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies