Evaluation of the esthetic results of dental restoration using the interdisciplinary approach to orthopedic rehabilitation of patients with aedentia

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study the dynamics of esthetic indicators during orthopedic dental treatment of patients requiring full-mouth rehabilitation.

Materials and methods. Within the study, an examination and treatment of 647 patients with adentia requiring full-mouth rehabilitation were carried out. Patients were divided into three groups. In the first group (218 people), the treatment with standard orthopedic dentistry techniques was performed. The medical care of the second group (195 people) included only several elements of the multidisciplinary approach, while for the third group (234 people), only the interdisciplinary approach was applied. The monitoring of involved patients was carried out for seven years.

Results. The application of the developed integrated multidisciplinary approach to orthopedic rehabilitation contributes to the fact that patients with adentia have a more favorable dynamics of esthetic indicators in relation to those who underwent a standard complex of treatment and rehabilitation measures. Thus, a statistically significant decrease was noted in the number of patients with the vertical shift of the smile line; smile asymmetry; gingival displacement; the impaired position of the incisors and fangs; mispronunciation of F and S sounds; inaccurate buccal tube placement; negative changes in the visualization of central incisors under the red border of the lips; differences in the size of the upper and lower central incisors; inadequate proximal contacts; and the inclination of the lower incisors.

Conclusions. The use of an interdisciplinary approach to the treatment of patients with adentia requiring full-mouth rehabilitation contributes to the constant improvement of aesthetic characteristics of the maxillofacial area.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. V. Yumashev

First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: dzalayevaf1630@bk.ru
Russian Federation, 119991, Moscow

Fatima K. Dzalaeva

First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: dzalayevaf1630@bk.ru

PhD, Doctor of Philosophy; Professor of the Department of Prosthodontics

Russian Federation, 119991, Moscow

S. O. Chikunov

First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); People's friendship University (RUDN)

Email: dzalayevaf1625@bk.ru
Russian Federation, 119991, Moscow; 117198, Moscow

A. S. Utyuzh

First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: dzalayevaf1625@bk.ru
Russian Federation, 119991, Moscow

Z. K. Dzhagaeva

North Ossetian State Medical Academy

Email: dzalayevaf1625@bk.ru
Russian Federation, Republic of North Ossetia — Alania, 362019, Vladikavkaz

References

  1. Mitin NE, Tikhonov VE, Vasilieva TA, Grishin MI. Modern criteria for evaluation of aesthetic results of dental treatment (literature review). Vestnik no-vykh meditsinskikh tekhnologii. 2015;(2):3–9. (in Russian)
  2. Vetchinkin AV. Aesthetic foundations of tooth shaping — a new approach to aesthetic restoration. Stomatologicheskii vestnik. 2012;(1):9. (in Russian)
  3. Lebedenko IYu, Kalivradzhiyan ES. Orthopedic dentistry. [Ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2012. (in Russian)
  4. Grabkov YP, Gavrilov YA, Romankov IA. Aesthetic norm of dental restorations in coordinate system of facial symmetry. Experience aesthetic prosthetic teeth from concept to clinical introduction. Morfologicheskii al'manakh imeni V.G. Koveshnikova. 2019;17(2):94–102. (in Russian)
  5. Bulycheva EA, Chikunov SO, Alpat'eva YuV. Aesthetic and functional resources in orthopedic dentistry. In: Tsimbalistov AV, Trifonov BV, Kopytov AA, eds. Dentistry of the Slavic states: proceedings of the -VIII International conference. [Stomatologiya slavyanskikh gosudarstv: materialy VIII Mezhdu-narodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii]. Moscow; 2015:54–6. (in Russian)
  6. Rosati R, De Menezes M, Rossetti A, Ferrario V, Sforza C. Three-dimensional analysis of dentolabial relationships: effect of age and sex in healthy denti-tion. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2012;41(11):1344–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.002.
  7. De Menezes M, Rosati R, Baga I, Mapelli A, Sforza C. Three-dimensional analysis of labial morphology: effect of sex and age. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2011;40(8):856–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011. 03.004.
  8. Romsics L, Segatto A, Boa K, Becsei R, Rózsa N, Szántó I, et al. Dentofacial mini- and microesthetics as perceived by dental students: a cross sectional multi-site study. PloS One. 2020;15(3):e0230182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230182.
  9. Thiyagarajan A, Kumar D. Dental esthetics: perception from future dental professionals. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences. 2018;2(4):3–5.
  10. Saffarpour A, Ghavam M, Saffarpour A, Dayani R, Fard M. Perception of laypeople and dental professionals of smile esthetics. J. Dent. (Tehran). 2016;13(2):85–91.
  11. Armalaite J, Jarutiene M, Vasiliauskas A, Sidlauskas A, Svalkauskiene V, Sidlauskas M, et al. Smile aesthetics as perceived by dental students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0673-5.
  12. Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-6.
  13. Bilal R, Arjumand B, Raheem S, Shabir O, Kanwal Q. Smile as perceived by orthodontist and general practitioners. Pakistan Orthodontic Journal. 2010;2(2):60–5.
  14. Kumar S, Gandhi S, Valiathan A. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2012;23(2):295. doi: 10.4103/0970–9290.100456.
  15. Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Al-Mashraqi AA, Al-Homoud M, Wafi S, Zakari A, et al. Perception of facial, dental, and smile esthetics by dental students. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2018;30(5):415–26. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12405.
  16. Strajnic L, Bulatovic D, Stancic I, Zivkovic R. Self-perception and satisfaction with dental appearance and aesthetics with respect to patients’ age, gender, and level of education. Srpski Arhiv Za Celokupno Lekarstvo. 2016;44(11–12):580–9.
  17. Li R, Mei L, Wang P, He J, Meng Q, Zhong L, et al. Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. Prog. Orthod. 2019;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y.
  18. Storrer CL, Valverde FK, Santos FR, Deliberador TM. Treatment of gummy smile: gingival recontouring with the containment of the elevator muscle of the upper lip and wing of nose. A surgery innovation technique. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2014;18(5):656–60. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.142468.
  19. Machado AW. 10 commandments of smile esthetics. Dental Press. J. Orthod. 2014;19(4):136–57. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.136-157.sar.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Number of patients with vertical displacement smile lines.

Download (217KB)
3. Fig. 2 Dynamics of the assessment of the buccal corridor.

Download (163KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86295 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80635 от 15.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies