Quality of life of patients with total loss of teeth and psychometric properties of the OHIP-20 DG enquirer. Part 1. Validization and automation

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous studies on the quality of life of patients with dental issues, no specific questionnaire is available for patients with total loss of teeth.

AIM: This study aimed to establish the level of validation and automation effectiveness of the OHIP-20 DG questionnaire for assessing life quality satisfaction of patients who received fully removable plate prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The questionnaire was validated by analyzing the psychometric parameters of 50 patients based on the results of the questionnaire survey (17 women, 33 men; aged 42–87 years).

RESULTS: The reliability (self-consistency) of the OHIP-20 DG questionnaire was adequate based on the following values: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, 0.78–0.81; individual functional scales, 0.66–0.73; convergent validity, 0.129–0.503; divergent validity, 0.0004–0.504; and discrimination, 0.40–0.89. The scaling success rate of symptomatic subscales ranged from 91.67% to 100%.

CONCLUSION: The OHIP-20 questionnaire is suitable as a measuring tool for assessing the life quality satisfaction of patients who received fully removable plate prostheses. The “OHIP-20-DG” application for mobile devices reduces the amount of routine operations in collecting data and processing examination results; thus, it can be recommended for clinical work in dental prosthetics.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey D. Arutyunov

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: sd.arutyunov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6512-8724
SPIN-code: 1052-4131
Scopus Author ID: 6601980084
ResearcherId: AAG-1917-2020

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, head of Department

Russian Federation, 20, Delegatskaya str., buil. 1, Moscow

Sergey A. Muslov

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: muslov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9752-6804
SPIN-code: 7213-2852
ResearcherId: AAK-9440-2020

Dr. Sci. (Biological, Physico-Mathematical), professor

Russian Federation, 20, Delegatskaya str., buil. 1, Moscow

Evgeny A. Chizhmakov

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: evgeniychigmakov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1313-3307
SPIN-code: 8122-7810

assistant

Russian Federation, 20, Delegatskaya str., buil. 1, Moscow

Dmitriy I. Grachev

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: dr.grachev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5758-7485
SPIN-code: 2307-4380
Scopus Author ID: 57216159925

Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor

Russian Federation, 20, Delegatskaya str., buil. 1, Moscow

Grigoriy S. Nersesov

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: nersesov.grisha@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1682-9772

assistant

Russian Federation, 20, Delegatskaya str., buil. 1, Moscow

Yaser N. Kharakh

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Author for correspondence.
Email: c.kharakh@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7181-8211
SPIN-code: 7217-1160
Scopus Author ID: 57204823557
ResearcherId: AAI-6091-2021

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor

Russian Federation, 20, Delegatskaya str., buil. 1, Moscow

References

  1. Kuzmina EM, Kuzmina IN, Vasina SA. Dental morbidity of the population of Russia. Condition of hard tissues of teeth. Prevalence of dentoalveolar anomalies. Need for prosthetics. Moscow: MSMSU; 2019. (In Russ).
  2. Abakarov SI, Alimskiy AV, Antonik MM et al. Prosthetic Dentistry: National Guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. (In Russ).
  3. Arutyunov SD, Kuz'michevskaya MV. Prevention of caries. Moscow: MSMSU. 2003. (In Russ).
  4. Balmasova IP, Tsarev VN, Arutiunov SD, Babayev EA. Filifactor alocis and its role in the etiology of chronic periodontitis. Stomatologiya. 2020; 99(3):78–82. (In Russ).
  5. Arutyunov SD, Bragin EA, Burlutskaya SI et al. Orthopedic dentistry. 3rd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. (In Russ).
  6. Tsimbalistov AV, Soboleva AV, Tsarev VN. et al. Clinical efficacy of removable dentures made of Nolatec photopolymeric base substance. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020;94(2):121–125. (In Russ).
  7. Grachev DI, Tsarev VN, Madzhidova ER, et al. Physical, mechanical and microbiological characteristics of the first domestic base material hybrid polymerization. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2021;97(1):144–8. (In Russ).
  8. Arutyunov SD, Polyakov DI, Muslov SA, et al. Study of the quality of life using a specific questionnaire QL PAER of patients after prosthetic reconstruction of the auricle. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2021; 97(1):160–164. (In Russ).
  9. Evsina OV. Quality of life in medicine is an important indicator of a patient's health status (literature review). Personality in a changing world: health, adaptation, development. 2013;(1):119–133. (In Russ).
  10. Gileva OS, Khalilaeva EV, Libik TV et al. Multistage validation of the international questionnaire on the quality of life "Impact profile of dental health" OHIP-49-RU. Ural Medical Journal. 2009;(8):104–109. (In Russ).
  11. Patent RUS № 2021613358/ 19.02.2021. Arutyunov SD, Muslov SA, Grachev DI et al. Computer program “OHIP-20-DG Available from: https://www.cyberpedia.su/3x2f8e.html Accessed: 30.01.2022. (In Russ).
  12. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
  13. Spearman CC. Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology. 1910;3(3):271–95.
  14. Brown W. Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology. 1910;3(3):296–322.
  15. Raschyot nadyozhnosti po formule Ryulona [Calculation of reliability according to the Ruhlon formula]. Available from: https://www.cyberpedia.su/3x2f8e.html. Accessed 30.01.2022. (In Russ).
  16. Tania D, Najaf Z, Peyman J, Mohammad MS. Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the Ferrans and Powers 3.0 index in hemodialysis patients. International urology and nephrology. 2014;46(6):1183–1189.
  17. Chiu EC, Hsueh IP, Hsieh CH, Hsieh CL. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in people who abuse heroin. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113(4):234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.05.010
  18. Almborg AH, Berg S. Quality of life among swedish patients after stroke: psychometric evaluation of SF-36. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2009;41(1):48–53.
  19. Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, eds. Rasch Models in Health. London: ISTE Ltd; 2013.
  20. Letova LV. Objective and accurate measurements of latent variables. Moscow: Direct-Media; 2016. (In Russ).
  21. Maslak AA. Theory and practice of measuring latent variables in education. Moscow: Yurayt; 2020. (In Russ).
  22. Anisimova TS, Maslak AA, Luk'yanenko MA. Strategy of anticipatory pedagogy and educational practice: problems and approaches. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Natural Sciences; 2016. (In Russ).
  23. Shirokorad VI, Shtevnina YuI, Shvyrev SL, Makhson AN, Dolgikh DV. The use of the technology of automated assessment of the quality of life of patients in the clinical practice of the urological oncology department. Oncourology. 2011;7(3):121–128. (In Russ).
  24. Cifrovaya medicina [Digital medicine]. Available from: https://www.zdrav.expert/index.php. Accessed: 30.01.2022. (In Russ).
  25. Chang YJ, Chang CH, Peng CL, et al. Measurement equivalence and feasibility of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: paper-and-pencil versus touch-screen administration. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:23. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-23
  26. Lapshikhina EA, Muslov SA. Study of the quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and the psychometric properties of the questionnaire EORTC QLQ-PR25. Scientific Review. Medical sciences. 2021;(4):16–31. (In Russ).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Windows of the program "OHIP-20-DG": a — input of personal data; b — answers to questions; c — results of QOL monitoring with the possibility of data output.

Download (226KB)
3. Fig. 2. Characteristic curve of the 1st point of the Mathcad questionnaire and experimental points averaged by groups (a). Characteristic curves of patients immediately after prosthetics for all levels of latent variables (n=50), "Matlab" (b, c).

Download (257KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86295 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80635 от 15.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies